Effect of the 19th Century on Children

Effect of the 19th ascorbic acid on ChildrenHow did the lives of children change during the 19th deoxycytidine monophosphate?Until the start of the industrial revolution, children were seen as small adults with few rights of their own. By the can of the nineteenth century puerility was a very different experience. The following essay will search how this change came ab out.Children of the poorer classes had been part of the labour force for centuries, only with the rise of the factories, their graze conditions changed. Children made up dickens-thirds of the workforce on powered equip pass ont in 143 peeing mills in England and Scotland 1 Conditions in factories were harsh, discipline strict and sometimes cruel, and hours were long. A mill worker is quoted in the Parliamentary Committee of 1832I worked from fin in the morning till nine at night. I lived two miles from the mill. We had no clock. If I had beena quarter of an hour too late, a half an hour would have been taken off. I only got a penny an hour, and they would have taken a halfpenny.2In 1833 the Royal thrill on the Employment of Children reported many instances of children being strapped or hit, much beca physical exertion a child had fallen asleep towards the end of a xiv hour twenty-four hours.3The Government tried to enforce some age restrictions in the early 1800s, but they were mainly ineffective because of the difficulty in proving childrens ages.4 In the 1830s factory owners argued that the reduction of hours would result in higher prices, but in 1833 the Althorps Factory Act decreased functional hours further, and by 1847 the ten-hour day was in place.In 1842 the Royal Commission carried out a Mines Report that revealed horrific conditionsIm a trapper in the Gawber pit. It does not tire me, but I have to trap without a fall and Im scared. I go at four and sometimes half past three in the morning and come out at five and half past. I never go to sleep. sometimes I sing when Ive light, but not in the semidark I dare not sing then. I dont like being in the pit.Sarah Gooder, aged 85Lord Ashley (later Shaftesbury) pointed out that in Wales it is not unusual to take them into the pits at 4 years6The use of climbing boys for cleaning chimney flues was also horrifying. There were reports of horrendous anxious or suffocation accidents, sometimes fatal. Campaigners against this practice included Charles Dickens, and Charles Kingsleys The water supply Babies created further awareness, and it was a year after its serialised publication that the use of children for chimney cleaning was banned.7However, census returns show that child labour did not reduce significantly until at least the 1880s. The figures for boys works in mines show that at that place was no decline in figures until 1881 when the figures decreased from 36,000 in 1871 to 26,000.8The reason wherefore so many families put their children to work was due to poverty. Henry Mayhew was told in 1851 My little girl began about sixShe never goes to school. We cant spare her.9 The growth of the population in the cities and towns, plus the immigration of the Irish during the potato famine, and further immigration from Africa and Asia, had led to massive overcrowding and hardship, and the existing short(p) Law legislation was no lasting effective. Children emergence up in urban slums were surrounded by dirt and disease, and infant mortality rank were high. Reports from people such as Edwin Chadwick and Henry Mayhew illustrated the squalor of living conditions for the working classes in the cities. The evangelical reformer, Lord Shaftesbury, witnessed the conditions when he visited Londons slums in 1846 and was struck bythe children, whom he described as a washout of beings apparently unk this instantn to the outside world nondescript, unknown, uncared for, begging on roadway corners, squatting on doorsteps, wading in the gutters. slightly had no piazza. Some had no name.10In t hese conditions children inevitably turned to crime or prostitution and when caught were punished as adults.11 Some children might be deported to Australia, where the growing conglomerate colonies needed extra labour.Social reformers such as Mary work had some influence in changing the treatment of child criminals, and growing public awareness led to an increase in charities and orphanages. Improved benefit legislation and the new opportunities for development in the 1870s did much to emend the situation.12The doorway of state fostering in 1870 created the or so effective change for the lives of working and poor children. Previously the only reading preparedness had been Dame Schools, sunshine Schools or Charity Schools, but children who went to these schools rarely received more than the basic three Rs. In many areas there was no school provision at all.13 Without income protection, wealthier families could fall victim to hard times. John Shinn, whose father expend ill and could not afford to send him to school, said The greatest and most serious misfortune of my life has been the loss of schooling or education14There was some debate on whether the education of the labouring classes would improve or damage society, but reformers such as the philosopher, John Stuart Mill, argued that companionship produces understanding and sensible behaviour.15 The extension of the vote to working class men in 1867 caused a greater awareness of the importance of education. However, there was whitewash a laissez-faire argument that the state had no right to be involved in education.The 1870 Education Act did not make schooling compulsory, or free. However, compulsory education was in place by the end of the 1870s, and the age for this rose over the next few decades until by the mid-twentieth century education was compulsory until the age of 16.With education and fewer working hours, unemployed time improved. As literacy increased, so did the availability of boo ks and magazines for children. By 1900 clubs and youth movements had been pock up to provide entertainment and to ensure that youngsters with time on their hands did not get into trouble.16For children of the middle and upper classes, life was different. Not call for to earn an income, most children received regular education, either at home or at a private school. However, educational provision for girls was normally poor or non-existent, and the prevailing attitude was that girls were of less importance. Molly Hughes, the lady friend of a stockbroker saidI was never taken to anything more arouse than a picture gallery, not even to a pantomime at ChristmasMy fathers slogan was that boys should go everywhere and know everything, and that a girl should stay at home and know nothing.17Due to the campaigns concerning touch on rights for women, girls education improved considerably during the century, with schools and colleges being set up in the 1850s, and university education fro m the 1870s.Looking back to his childhood in the 1840s, Charles Shaw wrote in 1893I wonder whether it is straightforward that I was allowed to be worked for fourteen hours a day when a little over seven years of agewhether it is true that even poor children now receive a better education thanTom Hughes if the rags, and squalor, and severe labour and long hours of those old age, as contrasted with the leisure, and plenty, and recreation of these days are all illusions?18This quote illustrates the changes for some children over the course of the century. Children were now regarded as a separate entity to be protected and cared for. They were no longer mini-adults to be used as another source of income, or left over(p) to roam the streets as orphans. Childhood, as a separate experience to adulthood, had been created.BibliographyAvery, Gillian, The echo Green Memories of Regency and victorian Youth, Collins, 1974Best, Geoffrey, Mid- tight-laced Britain 1851-1875, Fontana Press, 1990 Burnett, John, raft Obscure Autobiographies of Childhood, Education and Family from the 1820s to the 1920s, Penguin, 1984.Duckworth, Jeannie, Fagins Children wrong Children in Victorian England, Hambledon London, 2002Galbi, Douglas A., Child comprehend and the Division of Labour in the Early English Cotton Mills, 1994Golby, J. M. (Ed), Culture and Society in Britain 1850-1890, Oxford University Press, 1990Hansard, Parliamentary Debates, July 7, 1842, in Turral, J., (Ed) A Source-Book of British History, Oxford, 1925Horn, Pamela, The Victorian Town Child, Sutton Publishing, 1999Rubinstein, David, Victorian Homes, David Charles, 1974Steinbach, Susie, Women in England 1760-1914, Weidenfeld Nicolson, 2004Wilson, A. N., The Victorians, Arrow Books, 2003www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.ukwww.victorianweb.orgwww.wikipedia.org1Footnotes1 Galbi, Douglas A., Child Labour and the Division of Labour in the Early English Cotton Mills, 19942 quoted in www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/IRtime.htm3 Tay lor, D, get the hang Economic and Social History, Macmillan, pp.196-74 ibid. p.2005 quoted in www.victorianweb.org/history/ashley.html6 Hansard, Parliamentary Debates, July 7, 1842, in Turral, p.2947 Wilson, A. N., The Victorians, Arrow, p.295-2998 Best, G., Mid-Victorian Britain 1851-1875, Fontana, pp. 130-19 quoted in Steinbach, Susie, Women in England 1760-1914, p.16610 Duckworth, Jeannie, Fagins Children Criminal Children in Victorian England, p.311 ibid, p.612 ibid, pp.135-613 Taylor, pp.278-914 Burnett, John, Destiny Obscure Autobiographies of Childhood, Education and Family from the 1820s to the 1920s, Penguin, p.13615 Golby, J. M. (Ed), Culture and Society in Britain 1850-1890, OUP, p.13616 Horn Pamela, The Victorian Town Child, pp153-17917 Horn, p.2018 Avery, Gillian, The Echoing Green Memories of Regency and Victorian Youth, p.117