Rousseau’s Theory about Education

The neglected development of my fellow-creatures is the grand source of the misery I deplore.-Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Rousseau and Wollstonecraft believed that children should be allowed to puzzle freely and learn to use their didactics practically. Children would then grow up to be free thinking adults that would keep soceity from becoming temporal and oppressing. Nonetheless, they vehemently disagreed on who should receive such an education. Rousseau thought that only males, because they be stronger should receive such and education. Wollstonecraft believed everyone, no matter what sex, should be able to be educated to reform and better society as a whole. though both their works were considered extreme, they ar both apparent in the reality education system of today.Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) and Rousseau (1712-1778) both agreed that society oppressed valet kind, but Wollstonecraft felt that men were oppressing women. They both believed tha t education should mean allow children grow freely and placing little restrictions. They should protect them from immediate dangers and provide sustenance and shelter. They should not, however, force books and controlled learning upon the children. He thought that children should also develop public sense and each child would choose whatever interests him to study in greater detail. He thought that this method of education would produce a well balanced, free thinking child. Therefore this would lead to a immanent society rather than a materialistic one.Rousseaus theory of ingrained education was not intended for all children. He felt that girls should be limited motherhood, and how to be a wife. To Rousseau, women exist in order to service man, because they are weaker. Wollstonecraft stated that women should be taught medicine in order to military issue care of parents, infants, and husbands properly. She endorsed equal education for all children no matter what the sex. They should not only be taught the same things, but should be taught unitedly, to learn fond interaction they would encounter as adults. Girls and boys would attend day school together and then boys would be sent to their apprenticeships and girls would learn how to sew and other skills. Wollstonecraft act to prove that by denying a womans education you are denying her the ability to raise children adequately. Therefore it would benefit both sexes if women were properly educated.Rousseau was applauded for advocating benevolent rights and natural education but when it concerned women he broke no new ground. He actually promoted womens role as a wife and mother present to serve her husband. He stated that because women were weaker physically that their minds were as well. Wollstonecraft upheld his philosophy of natural education to encourage individual exemption to benefit society. However, she detested his treatment of women.She advised that women and men should both be educated, and educated together. Both of Emile and The Vindication of the Rights of Women were considered alkali, they were both revolutionaries. Emile wedged practical applications, and the exploration of natural curiosity in education. Wollstonecrafts radical idea of educating boys and girls equally, and together are applied on public education today.